Monday, September 19, 2011

Emmys 2011

Host Jane Lynch couldn't quite save the night

Modern Family once again reigned over the Comedy category
I like to think of myself as a amateur connoisseur of television. I ingest half-hour sitcoms like candy, and marathon through seasons of hour-long dramas like I’ve got nothing better to do with my time. And, as a consequence, I love it when my favorite shows head off to an awards ceremony. The 63rd Primetime Emmy Awards, held on the blistering hot LA night of September 18, were possibly the most bipolar awards I’ve seen in years. And while they could have made for an enjoyable night, I spent most of the time cringing for all of the awkward comedy and repeat winners.

The night started off on a fairly flat note. Host Jane Lynch began an extensive song and dance number under the premise that all of the people working in television live in the same building together. Lynch wandered in to multiple different sets of popular shows, such as Mad Men, and The Big Bang Theory. The comedy was only moderately funny, and mostly just seemed like a pile of jokes were flung against the wall, and nothing completely stuck. Once the pre-taped portion was over, Lynch came out singing with dancers in a choreographed routine that could barely hold my interest.

Then we headed into the comedy category, after a brief original musical introduction by “The Emmytones”, a group of television actors who looked awkward while singing, but adorable once they were just standing there. (I blame the silly grins of Community’s Joel McHale and Chuck’s Zachary Levi for the most part.) Right off the bat, Modern Family took home the first three trophies of the night. Which, given the history of the show, was pretty much expected. The real surprise of the night was Academy of Television Arts & Sciences (the voters for these particular awards) finally recognizing Friday Night Lights, possibly one of the most underrated shows of all time. In a move that can only make fans and critics happy, the final season of the critically acclaimed show won for Best Writing of a Drama Series (Jason Katims) and Best Lead Actor in a Drama (Kyle Chandler). Although fans are undoubtedly miffed at the snub of Connie Britton for Best Leading Actress in a Drama, they should still go away happy to be able to call their beloved show as “Emmy award winning”.

The highlight of the night for myself was the presentation of Best Supporting Actress in a Comedy. Instead of the nominees staying in their chairs, acknowledging the camera in their face for reaction shots, all of the nominees climbed up on stage, ala a Miss America pageant. (Special kudos to Tina Fey, who attempted to kiss her 30 Rock costar,  a faux disgruntled Jack McBrayer.) And when surprise winner Melissa McCarthy from Mike & Molly was crowned victor of this year’s race, she literally was crowned. Complete with roses and an tiara, McCarthy gave a tearful speech that I found adorable and endearing. I’ve enjoyed her work since Gilmore Girls, but have yet to check out Mike & Molly. But considering the heavyweights in the category, she must be doing something right.

But, at the end of the day, predictability won over the competition. Mad Men continued into its fourth straight win in the Best Drama category, while Modern Family got its second consecutive win for Best Comedy. It sort of felt like I was just watching the recorded version of last year’s ceremony. The same people were on the stage at the end of the night, and the same speeches were made. I’m all for the Academy celebrating the excellence of their peers, but only if we change up every once and awhile what “the best” is. Overall, the night took me on an emotional roller coaster, and by the end, I just wanted off.

Here's a complete list of the 2011 Emmy winners.

5 comments:

  1. OPENING: Full star
    IDENTIFICATION: Half star
    SUMMARY: Half star
    OPINION: Full star
    CLOSING: Full star

    TOTAL: 4 out of 5 stars

    Jessica-

    Your opinion in this piece is very present, though not overbearing. This is a difficult balance to achieve as reviewers. I applaud you for that, though I wouldn't agree with all of your opinions (this is beside the point) ;). If there wasn't as much time spent on the summary of the show, with more light shed on the description of the show, you'd receive a full five stars. This is very great though.

    -Jason

    ReplyDelete
  2. Very well done. Your opinion is clear and have a good amount of examples to back it up. Your pictures with comments added a nice touch to you review. One thing I would say though is that you didn’t have any links to the shows that you mentioned. You had a link to the winners of the award show, but I think you review would have been stronger if you had links in titles link The Big Bang Theory and Friday Night Lights. That way if the reader doesn’t know what you’re talking about they can easily click the link and read a quick summery then get beck to your review.

    Opening: Full tar
    Identification: Half Star
    Summary: Full Star
    Opinion: Full Star
    Closing: Full Star

    Total: Four and a Half Stars

    ReplyDelete
  3. Opening: *
    Identification: 1/2 *
    Summary: *
    Opinion: *
    Closing: *
    OVERALL: **** 1/2 (4 1/2 stars)

    Such a great intro! We must share occupations. ("I like to think of myself as a amateur connoisseur of television.") That being said, I thoroughly enjoyed your opinions of the Emmy's and the recap of the events. Your identification suffered a little bit as your summary of the show was rightfully emphasized, but overall good work!!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Jessica, this piece treads a little bit of a fine line for me between reviewing the Emmy broadcast and reporting/analyzing the Emmy outcomes. I think in the second half of the piece, especially, you lose your focus on how the show worked and venture more into what you think of who the awards went to. It's a hair-splitting distinction to some extent but makes a difference, I think. What if, in the latter part of the review, you contrasted the Jane Lynch era with earlier presenters' regimes? Or discussed whether or not we can ever expect an awards show to buck the corny/lame trend, which seems to be built into the very structure of awards galas? Food for thought.

    ReplyDelete